Correcting the Biggest Misconception About This Decision
Most businesses treat this as a much larger decision than it needs to be, assuming Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms each require their own dedicated hardware brand. That assumption does not hold up once the actual certification landscape is looked at properly.
Here is the actual reality - plenty of hardware, particularly from Logitech and Yealink, holds dual certification for both Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms. The same physical device can often run either platform, with the difference coming down to licensing rather than the hardware itself, which removes most of the pressure people feel around getting this decision exactly right on the first attempt.
This matters because it changes the order in which decisions should be made. Hardware does not need to wait for the platform decision, and the platform decision does not need to be treated as permanent just because equipment has already been purchased.
The myth largely comes from marketing presentation rather than technical reality. Each platform publishes its own certified hardware list, which visually looks like two separate ecosystems, but a side-by-side comparison of the actual device names reveals far more shared hardware than the separate lists suggest.
What Actually Differs Between the Two Platforms
The real differences sit entirely in the software layer. Admin consoles, integration depth with existing tools, and meeting scheduling all vary between the two platforms, even when the underlying hardware in the room is identical.
Integration with existing software is where most businesses actually find their answer. A business already running Microsoft 365 for email and file storage will find Teams Rooms slots in with far less friction, since scheduling and calendar integration come built in. A business already standardised on Zoom for client-facing calls may prefer the consistency of Zoom Rooms instead.
Meeting scheduling UX is subtly different too. Teams Rooms ties directly into Outlook calendars by default, while Zoom Rooms can integrate with either Google Workspace or Microsoft calendars depending on configuration. Neither is objectively better, but one will usually match an existing workflow more closely than the other.
There are also small differences in how each platform handles room booking on the day, such as how easily someone can extend a meeting that is running over or check in for a booking from the room panel itself. These details rarely decide the platform choice on their own, but they do affect day-to-day staff experience once a system is in place.
Hardware Compatibility - Where the Myth Falls Apart
The dual certification across Logitech and Yealink hardware is well documented by both Microsoft and Zoom directly, and it is the strongest practical evidence that hardware compatibility should not be the factor driving this decision.
The hardware was never the argument. The license invoice is.
The actual financial difference sits in licensing, not hardware. Per-room licensing cost depends heavily on whatever Microsoft 365 or Zoom subscription tier a business already holds, and that existing relationship often makes one platform cheaper in practice than the sticker price alone would suggest.
Local buyers usually settle the decision with Kickstart AV and Technology once the comparison is settled.
The practical recommendation, then, is to choose hardware based on room size and audio or camera priority first, confirm it carries dual certification where possible, and let the platform decision be driven by software integration and existing subscription costs rather than hardware availability.
This sequencing also guards against the outcome businesses fear most - settling on a platform only to find the hardware they wanted is not supported. Confirming dual certification at the hardware stage removes that risk before the platform decision is even finalised.
What People Usually Ask About This Decision
Can the same camera and mic work on both systems?
It depends on the specific model, but a meaningful amount of Logitech and Yealink hardware is certified for both platforms, meaning the same device can often run either Zoom Rooms or Teams Rooms depending on which software license is applied.
Which platform has lower ongoing licensing costs?
The cheaper option depends heavily on what subscription tier a business already holds. A business already on a higher Microsoft 365 tier may find Teams Rooms licensing cheaper in practice, while a business with no existing Microsoft subscription may find Zoom Rooms more straightforward to price.
Does using Microsoft 365 make Teams Rooms the obvious choice?
Teams Rooms is usually the smoother fit given the built-in calendar integration, though businesses with heavy external Zoom usage for client meetings sometimes still prefer Zoom Rooms despite running Microsoft 365 internally.
Is it normal to mix Zoom Rooms and Teams Rooms across an office?
This is more common than most people expect, especially in larger offices, and there is no inherent technical conflict in having different rooms run on different platforms.